Find the savings hiding in your maintenance data

It is the part of a CMMS that turns day-to-day work into numbers you can act on — what failed, how long it was down, who did the work and what it cost. The value depends entirely on the data being captured as the work happens rather than typed up afterwards.

Nobody keys it in. Every figure comes from work already recorded: jobs opened and closed, time booked against them, parts consumed, inspection answers, meter readings. The reports are a view of that, not a second system to maintain.

Availability, downtime hours, failure counts, mean time between failures and mean time to repair per asset. Completion rates and overdue work by technician or site. Job costs, parts consumed, profit by client, invoice ageing and fuel. Inspection pass rates and the checks that fail most often.

No. QAI ships a fixed set of reports rather than a drag-and-drop builder, and there is no custom dashboard to arrange. What you can do is filter every report — by date range, site, technician, priority or job type — and export the result. If a bespoke report builder is a requirement, say so early.

Not today. There is no scheduled send: you open a report, filter it and export it. Teams that need a weekly report in an inbox currently do that step themselves.

Yes. Job performance reports carry the previous period alongside the current one, so a completion rate reads as better or worse rather than as a number on its own.

Partly, and it is worth being exact. Job and asset reports filter by site, so you can run the same question for each building and lay the answers side by side. Checklist analytics does not filter by site yet, so cross-site comparison of individual checks is not there.

Yes. Time booked against jobs, parts consumed, and cost per job roll up into profit by client and spend by category. This is the reporting most maintenance software leaves out, and it is the reporting a budget conversation needs.

No. QAI does not classify work as planned or unplanned, so it cannot report that ratio. It will tell you which assets fail most often, how often each recurs and what each failure cost, which is the evidence you would use to change a maintenance interval.

Any report to Excel, and any inspection or job to PDF. What leaves QAI is what you hand to a client, an auditor or the finance team, with the photographs and signatures still attached.

Every completed inspection keeps who performed it, when it started and finished, how long it took, the GPS coordinates, the photographs and the signature — with a second approval signature where a checklist requires one. It is searchable months later and exports as a PDF.